HISTORY146 - The Way We Learn
Once again, this blog arose out
of talking with Pat, who was telling me how interesting it was to remember
people in her past law-librarian and knitting-store-owner lives who strongly
preferred different methods of learning (visual or reading) to prepare law
cases and to learn to knit. That talk
led to the “history of the way we learn” as a blog topic.
After
an introduction to different personal learning styles, I will discuss the
history of the way we learn in succeeding historic eras, including prehistory,
early civilizations, the Middle Ages, the early printing press era, the
Industrial Revolution, the rise of the science behind how we learn, and the
digital age. I will finish with a
snapshot of learning in the future.
As
usual, I will list my principal sources at the end.
Introduction
Today, we know that humans learn by actively connecting new information to their existing
knowledge, physically rewiring the brain’s neural networks through repeated
experience. This active process requires engagement,
repetition, and the integration of both cognitive understanding and emotional
states to build long-term memory.
The
four traditional methods of learning, commonly referred to as the VARK
model, describe the primary ways individuals prefer to take in and process
information:
·
Visual: Learning through seeing. Visual learners process information best
using charts, graphs, maps, diagrams, and videos.
·
Auditory: Learning through hearing. Auditory learners absorb information best by
listening to spoken instructions, lectures, podcasts, and participating in
group discussions.
·
Read/Write: Learning through text. These learners prefer engaging with the
written word, such as reading textbooks, writing essays, reviewing manuals, and
making lists.
·
Kinesthetic: Learning through doing. Kinesthetic learners thrive on hands-on
experience, physical movement, real-life examples, and trial-and-error
activities.
While most people utilize a combination of these methods,
most individuals have a dominant preference that helps them study and retain
information more effectively.
The
history of learning spans from oral storytelling in ancient times to Artificial
Intelligence (AI) tutors today. It evolved from community-based survival
knowledge to structured, institutionalized schools, eventually transforming
into personalized digital education. This progression highlights changing societal
needs, technological advancements, our changing understanding of cognitive
development, and information access - how the human brain acquires, processes,
and retains knowledge.
Oral Tradition and Apprenticeship (Prehistory to 3500
BC)
Before
written language, during the prehistoric and early agricultural eras - survival
skills, cultural stories, and traditions were passed down entirely through
storytelling and observation. Learning
was experiential; individuals learned by doing, whether through hunting,
gathering, or crafting tools. In early
civilizations, this grew into apprenticeships where learners absorbed
specialized skills - like farming, metalworking, or masonry - by working
directly alongside a master who taught trades to the next generation directly
on the job.
·
Oral Storytelling: Elders used memorized narratives, myths, and songs to
pass down tribal history, moral codes, and survival techniques. Humans relied entirely on the spoken word to
communicate history, laws, and religious beliefs.
·
Observational
Learning: Children
learned to hunt, gather, and build tools by watching and mimicking adults. Children and younger members of a community
learned essential skills by participating directly in daily routines, such as
knapping stone tools, spinning fibers, or preparing food.
·
Immediate
Application: Knowledge was
tested instantly by the environment. Mistaking a poisonous berry or failing to
track an animal had immediate consequences.

Early cavemen practicing oral storytelling.
·
Specialized
Crafting: As tools and
pottery became more advanced, experts passed down complex knowledge of
agriculture, animal husbandry, and metallurgy.
Novices worked closely with masters in apprenticeships to learn specific
techniques.
This
quote from The Learning Stack captures the essence of learning in oral
cultures:
Note: The Learning Stack (learn-stack.com) is an advisory
and strategic content organization. It
provides guidance for corporate training professionals navigating the highly
complex Learning
& Development technology market.
For
most of human history, people learned without writing. In oral cultures, knowledge was passed on
through stories, songs, dance, and shared rituals. Learning wasn’t something done alone, sitting
quietly. It was social, emotional, and physical. These weren’t just ways to entertain. They
were memory tools, finely tuned to how the human brain works. A song might map out a route across the
land. A dance might carry instructions
for building a shelter. Stories taught
history, values, and survival. The lesson,
the storyteller, the setting, and the emotion were all part of one inseparable
experience. Learning was rich, active,
and deeply connected to everyday life.
But there were limits. Oral
knowledge could only travel so far or grow so complex. Details were lost or changed over time. Writing would solve that, but also change
learning forever.
The Birth of
Formal Education (3500 BC - AD 500)
As agriculture created stable societies, writing
systems emerged. Learning transformed
from an informal community practice into a structured privilege for elite male
classes.
·
The Sumerian Tablet Houses: In ancient
Mesopotamia (around 3500 BC), the invention of cuneiform writing (starting as pictographs before
evolving into abstract, wedge-shaped strokes to allow for faster writing) led to the
creation of the first schools, called edubbas. Boys learned reading, writing, and math by
copying text onto wet clay tablets.
·
Early Egyptian Training: The rise of hieroglyphic writing (pictorial characters to represent
objects, ideas, and sounds) in Egypt created a need for formal instruction.
Schools emerged to train scribes, priests, and administrators in reading,
writing, and mathematics. Students
learned by copying texts onto papyrus (made from the fibrous core of the
Nile River delta plant), memorizing vocabularies, and practicing mathematics.
·
The Greek Socratic Method: In Athens,
learning focused on the mind and body. Great thinkers like Socrates and Plato
introduced dialogue-based learning, using targeted questioning to challenge
assumptions and uncover deeper truths.
·
Philosophy & Rhetoric: In Classical
Greece and the Roman Empire, formalized systems of education developed for the
children of the wealthy. Boys studied
philosophy, reading, writing, mathematics, physical training, and the art of
public speaking (rhetoric) to prepare for political and civic life -
establishing the foundation of the Western liberal arts.

Boys at school in ancient Rome.
·
Confucianism and Civil Service: In China,
education was deeply tied to ethics and state governance. Learning required rigorous memorization of
classical texts to pass highly competitive civil service exams.
·
Monastic & Temple Centers: Religious
institutions in India, China, and the Middle East preserved advanced knowledge
of astronomy, medicine, and spiritual texts, often teaching disciples through
intensive mentorship and scriptural study.
The vast majority of people learned through hands-on
experience, working alongside parents, guilds, or masters to acquire vital
agricultural, metallurgical, and craft skills.
This quote from The Learning Stack captures the
impact of the development of writing:
The first writing
systems weren’t just ways to record speech; they changed how humans think. Learning to read reshapes the brain through a
process called neuroplasticity, our brain’s ability to physically change based
on experience. As people learned to
read, a new region of the brain developed: the visual word form area, which
helps us recognize words quickly and connect them to meaning. This shift made abstract thinking and
analysis possible, laying the foundation for science, philosophy, and
logic. But written language also created
new social divides. Those who could read and write gained access to power and
influence. Everyone else was left
behind.
Religious Monasteries, Medieval
Universities, and Apprenticeships (6th - 14th Century)
Following
the fall of Rome, during the Middle Ages, from the 6th to 14th
century, education was predominantly controlled by the Church, and shaped by
social class. Most commoners learned
informally through oral tradition, apprenticeships, and family life, while
formal academics relied heavily on rote memorization, listening to lectures,
and Latin texts.
Monasteries
and Cathedral Schools:
·
Monastic Schools: In the early Middle Ages, monasteries became the main
keepers of knowledge. Monks copied
manuscripts, preserved ancient texts, and taught boys preparing for religious
life.
·
Cathedral
Schools: By the 12th
century, urban expansion led to the creation in cities of cathedral schools,
which charged tuition.
·
The Curriculum: These schools taught the Trivium (grammar,
rhetoric, logic) and the Quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, astronomy,
music). All subjects were taught
strictly in Latin.
The
Rise of Medieval Universities:
·
In the late 11th
and 12th centuries, students and teachers organized into guilds,
establishing some of the earliest formal universities, such as the University
of Bologna and the University of Oxford.
·
Because books
were rare and incredibly expensive, learning involved teachers reading single
manuscripts aloud while students listened, memorized, and discussed.
Apprenticeships
and Trade Skills:
·
For the vast
majority of peasants and commoners, formal schooling was inaccessible and
unnecessary for survival.
·
Instead, children
began learning practical skills at a young age.
Boys were often sent to live with a master to learn a specific trade -
such as blacksmithing or weaving - through a seven-year apprenticeship.
·
Girls learned
household management, agriculture, basic medicine, and crafts directly from
their mothers.

Medieval apprenticeship in a tool shop.
Informal
& Visual Learning:
·
With extremely
low literacy rates, communities relied on visual and auditory learning. Churches were covered in painted murals and
stained-glass windows, which were designed to visually teach biblical stories
and moral lessons to illiterate commoners.
·
Knowledge of
local history, customs, and laws was passed down through spoken stories,
village gatherings, and public announcements.
This
quote from The Learning Stack captures the importance of
apprenticeships:
Over time, another powerful learning model emerged: apprenticeship. A young learner would work alongside a master to gain real-world skills, not just by reading, but by watching, copying, and trying things for themselves. This method was excellent at passing on tacit knowledge, the kind of know-how that’s hard to explain with words. Things like timing, intuition, judgement, or technique. Apprentices learned by doing, not by sitting in a classroom. It also reflected how humans naturally learn best: with others. In education theory, this process is supported by the idea of the Zone of Proximal Development. It describes the sweet spot where a learner is stretched just beyond what they can do alone, but can succeed with guidance. The master served as a “more knowledgeable other,” helping the apprentice grow step by step. While apprenticeships weren’t perfect, as some involved harsh conditions or unfair labor, the core model worked. It spread skills quickly and helped entire industries evolve. Most importantly, it was deeply aligned with how our brains are wired to learn.
The Printing Press
and Mass Literacy (15th - 17th Century)
Between the 15th and 17th
centuries, learning transitioned from rare, oral memorization in Latin to
widespread education in local languages.
Driven by Johannes Gutenberg’s invention of the movable-type printing
press in 1440, the Renaissance, and the Protestant Reformation, learning
methods shifted toward reading, critical thinking, and structured schools.
·
The Printing Press Revolution: The
rise of a practical printing press made books cheaper and more accessible. Rather than relying on memorizing passages
read aloud by teachers, scholars and the public could now read printed texts. Books became widely available, shifting
learning away from pure rote memorization to reading and individual
interpretation.

The printing press enabled mass literacy.
The printing press was crucial because it enabled the mass production of books and documents, democratizing access to information. By replacing laborious hand-copying with mechanical movable type, it drastically reduced costs, fueled a surge in literacy, and accelerated the spread of scientific and religious ideas.
·
Apprenticeships: For the working and peasant classes,
learning was still heavily hands-on.
Trades were passed down generationally, and children often learned to
survive and work through domestic and agricultural apprenticeships.
· Grammar Schools: Formal schooling expanded, with children learning reading, writing, and religion using a "hornbook" - a wooden paddle with a printed alphabet and scripture on it. Learning still heavily relied on rote memorization and repetition.
·
University and Humanism:
Universities (such as Oxford and those in Italy) taught the liberal arts, law,
medicine, and theology in Latin. The
Renaissance sparked a shift toward "humanism," encouraging students
to study classic Greek and Roman texts and think critically rather than just
reciting them.
·
Shift to Native Languages: The
Reformation led to an emphasis on reading the Bible in one's own language. This sparked a major shift toward education
and literacy in native languages instead of strictly confining knowledge to
those fluent in Latin.
Industrialization
and Standardization (18th - 19th Century)
The
Industrial Revolution radically reshaped the way the masses learned. Learning shifted from a luxury privilege -
dominated by classical tutoring and apprenticeships - to a formalized,
state-sponsored system. As societies
shifted from agrarian to urban and industrial economies, schools were
standardized to mass-produce literate, punctual, and disciplined workers. This era introduced grade levels,
standardized testing, and birthed the modern public education system.
·
Standardization: Students were grouped by
chronological age rather than ability. Learning was divided into strict time blocks
signaled by bells, mimicking factory shifts.
·
Rote Memorization: Instruction was
teacher-centric, designed to teach foundational skills to the masses, focusing
on repetitive memorization, standardized curricula, and passive listening.
Once again, The Learning Stack captures the
essence of the period:
Then came the Industrial Revolution. Suddenly, society needed millions of workers
with basic literacy, punctuality, and a tolerance for routine. Apprenticeships couldn’t scale fast
enough. The solution was to build a new
kind of learning system, one that looked a lot like a factory. This is where modern schooling was born: Students grouped by age, like products on an
assembly line. A standardized curriculum
moved everyone along at the same pace.
Bells signaled when to move, speak, or stop. Teachers became information-deliverers;
students became passive receivers. This
marked a huge break from how humans had always learned. Knowledge was now separated from context. Instead of learning by doing, students
learned about things in abstract, disconnected ways. The goal wasn’t mastery or creativity. It was standardization: training people to
fit the needs of industrial society.
This “factory model” still shapes most of our schools today, even though
the world around us has changed dramatically.
Formal Schooling
& The Rise of Public Education:
·
18th
Century: Education was
largely reserved for the wealthy.
Wealthy boys attended grammar schools or had private tutors, while girls
often focused on domestic skills and penmanship. Working-class children rarely received formal
education.
·
19th
Century: The push for
free universal, public education transformed learning. By the 1850s, public town schools became
commonplace, expanding access to both boys and girls. Students were grouped by chronological age
rather than ability. Learning was
divided into strict time blocks signaled by bells, mimicking factory
shifts.
·
Rural Education: Rural students typically learned in one-room
schoolhouses. Younger children sat at the front, while older students sat in
the back. Teachers instructed one group
at a time while others worked independently at their desks.
·
Teaching Methods: Instruction was teacher-centric, designed to teach
foundational skills to the masses, focusing on repetitive memorization,
standardized curricula, and passive listening.
Learning relied heavily on rote memorization and recitation. Students chanted the alphabet, spelled out
loud, and memorized poems and math proofs.
Lessons centered on the “Three R's” (Readin', Ritin', and Rithmetic),
along with geography, history, and penmanship.
The
Mechanics of Learning:
·
Textbooks: Students relied heavily on foundational texts like the
McGuffey Readers and Webster's American Spelling Book.
·
Materials: Because paper was expensive, students used wooden
slates and soapstone pencils to practice their handwriting and arithmetic,
wiping them clean to reuse them.
·
Discipline: Learning was strict.
Physical discipline and "drill exercises" (marching,
head-turning, and arm stretching) were heavily used to instill order and
discipline.
Vocational
and Higher Education:
·
Apprenticeships: For the working class, trades were still primarily
learned on the job. Young people entered
into contracts to work for a master craftsman in exchange for learning a
specific trade, such as blacksmithing, carpentry, or printing.
·
Academies &
Universities: Higher education
was typically restricted to upper-class men.
However, the late 19th century saw significant expansion,
with more colleges opening for women and African Americans.
Self-Education:
·
Reading &
Debating: For adults,
self-improvement was highly valued.
People learned through mechanics' institutes, public libraries, and
community debating or literary societies.
Men and women actively learned about civic life and self-governance by
participating in strict organizational meetings, reading civic guides (like Robert's
Rules of Order), and keeping detailed meeting minutes.
Rise of the Science Behind How We Learn (20th Century)
Psychologists and educators began to
study how people learn. Theorists
moved away from rote memorization towards, recognizing that learners actively
build knowledge rather than just passively receiving it.
·
Behaviorism (Early 20th Century): Led
by thinkers like B.F. Skinner, this is the belief that all behaviors are
acquired through conditioning. Learning
is viewed as a response to environmental stimuli, often driven by rewards and
punishments.
·
Cognitivism (Mid-20th Century): As
the human brain began to be compared to a computer, cognitivism explored
memory, problem-solving, and how the mind processes and retains information.
·
Constructivism (Late 20th Century):
Educational reformers like John Dewey and Jean Piaget argued that learners are
not passive vessels. Instead,
individuals actively construct knowledge based on their experiences and
interactions with the world.
The science of learning
is an interdisciplinary field - combining cognitive science, neuroscience, and
psychology - that investigates how the human brain acquires and retains
information. It is critical because it
replaces outdated educational habits with evidence-backed strategies,
maximizing knowledge retention and cognitive growth for all learners.
This era did give rise to specialized
teaching methods focused on child development and individualized cognitive
growth. But despite these psychological
insights, standard institutional learning remained anchored to lectures,
textbooks, rote memorization, and high-stakes testing. Lifelong learning outside of school happened
through daily newspapers, public libraries, and community organizations.
Formal Schooling:
Standardized curricula was taught through physical textbooks, chalkboards, and
structured classroom lectures, often relying on memorization and standardized
testing.
·
Mass Media: The rise of radio and television
allowed educational and cultural programming to broadcast directly into homes,
expanding access to news, documentaries, and instructional broadcasts.
·
Physical Archives: Public libraries, encyclopedias, and
microfiche archives served as the primary methods for independent research and
fact-finding.
·
Correspondence Courses:
People completed vocational, academic, and professional training via mail,
exchanging physical assignments and study materials with educators.
·
Community & Apprenticeships:
Practical, hands-on skills were frequently passed down in person through trade
apprenticeships, on-the-job training, and community-based workshops.
The Digital Age and Connectivism (21st Century)
In
the 21st century, learning is positioned to transition to personalized,
continuous, and decentralized methods.
Learning no longer has to be confined to the physical classroom. Instead of memorizing facts, people can utilize
a mix of digital tools, global networks, and hands-on experiences to develop
flexible, lifelong skills. But this
exploitation of the digital world for learning is not happening yet; it should
be but it isn’t.
Characteristics
of Digital Learning:
·
The "4
Cs:" Education
prioritizes critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity
over rote memorization.
·
Digital &
Information Literacy: Navigating a sea
of data means learning how to fact-check, analyze sources, and use technology
ethically.
·
Lifelong
Learning: Because
technology evolves rapidly, people can continually “upskill” and “reskill”
throughout their entire lives to adapt to a changing workforce.
·
Microlearning
& Online Platforms: Instead of
traditional multi-year schooling, people can consume knowledge via bite-sized
online courses, tutorials, and interactive podcasts.
·
Informal &
Community Learning: Knowledge can be
shared across borders through global forums, collaborative workspaces, and
open-source communities.
Theories
like Connectivism suggest that digital learning can occur across vast networks
of people and information, utilizing AI and personalized learning
platforms. It emphasizes how people use
the internet, digital resources, and peer connections to learn continuously.
·
Information
Abundance: The barrier to
knowledge has dropped. Platforms like
Khan Academy and Coursera allow individuals to learn complex subjects
on-demand, from anywhere in the world.
·
Algorithmic
Personalization: Instead of a
single teacher pacing an entire classroom, digital software can adjust lessons
in real-time to match a student's specific learning speed.
·
AI Tutors: Artificial Intelligence tutors can provide
personalized, on-demand education. This
allows learners to acquire new skills instantly, moving the focus toward
self-directed, lifelong learning.
·
Immersive
Learning: Virtual Reality
(VR) and Augmented Reality (AR), can provide immersive experiences that allow
students to explore historical sites or visualize complex scientific concepts
interactively.
Digital learning is not happening
yet: Pat and I don’t see digital learning in the curriculum of our elementary
age grandchildren. The old approach
persists. As far as we can tell,
youngsters and adults alike are using the fantastic gift of digital resources
for constant social media participation and entertainment almost exclusively.
The internet changed
everything again. Suddenly, information
became available to almost anyone, anywhere, at any time. We no longer need to rely on gatekeepers like
libraries, institutions, or formal teachers.
This has empowered the autodidact, someone who teaches themselves, often
by following curiosity and using freely available resources. But here’s the new paradox: we’re drowning in
information, but still struggling to learn.
Many schools still rely on passive, outdated methods. They don’t teach
the skills we need to handle the digital world, like how to filter information,
question sources, or connect ideas.
We’re surrounded by content, but lack the tools to learn deeply, think
critically, and make sense of what we find.
The Future of Learning
The
future of learning offers hyper-personalization powered by AI, immersive VR/AR
experiences, and continuous upskilling.
Education can shift from rote memorization to building adaptable,
lifelong skills, where human educators collaborate with AI mentors to tailor
knowledge specifically to your needs.
Here
are several aspects of possible future of learning that you can consider:
Core
Trends Positioned to Shape Education:
·
AI-Driven
Adaptive Learning: Instead of
one-size-fits-all instruction, AI platforms can tailor the pace, style, and
content to your unique learning journey in real time.
·
Immersive
Environments: AR and VR allow
you to step inside history, explore biological processes from the inside, or
simulate complex chemistry and physics without leaving your seat.
·
The
"Netflix" of Learning:
Traditional, rigid degree paths can give way to flexible, modular
micro-credentialing. You can build a custom, evolving portfolio of skills
suited to a shifting job market.
Skills
of Tomorrow: With AI
automating routine information retrieval, human learning can heavily prioritize
abilities that machines cannot easily replicate:
·
Prompting &
Critical Thinking: Knowing how to
ask the right questions and evaluate AI-generated answers for accuracy and
bias.
·
Problem-Solving
& Innovation: Synthesizing
ideas across multiple disciplines.
·
Collaboration
& Adaptability: Working in
diverse teams and pivoting seamlessly as new technologies emerge.
Here’s
a realistic assessment of AI in learning today - from The Learning
Stack:
The
modern learner is both curious and guided. They teach themselves like an autodidact but
seek support like an apprentice. And
now, Artificial Intelligence offers a new kind of support: a personal, tireless
practice partner.
What AI Can Help With:
·
24/7 Support: You can get help anytime, anywhere.
·
Personal Pacing: It adapts to your level and breaks things down in
different ways.
·
No Embarrassment: You can ask basic questions or make mistakes
without fear of judgment.
What AI Still Can’t Do:
·
Real Experience: It can’t teach the feel of a situation or the
judgment that comes from lived experience.
·
Inspiration and Mentorship: A great human teacher doesn’t just explain; they
motivate, model, and connect learning to life.
The
best approach is to combine AI with human mentors. Let AI help with the “what” and “how” so that
your time with a person can focus on the “why” and “when,” the parts of
learning that require wisdom, timing, and care.
Most importantly, we need to unlearn the passivity taught by the factory
model and reclaim our natural ability to learn through doing, reflecting, and
connecting with others.
My question is, when will digital techniques
and resources be applied to one the most important functions of human life?
Sources
My principal
sources include: “A Brief History of Learning,” thelearningstack.sugstack.com;
plus, numerous other online sources, including answers to many queries
using Google in AI-Mode.







Wow! Fascinating! Your article made me think about how I learn and I am mostly a combination learner but if forced to learn only one way, it would be by reading. I love AI almost as much as I distrust it and it certainly helps (most of the time) when I hit an impasse using one of the many computer programs I use (Photoshop, InDesign, Kindle, Word, Excel to name just a few!). The distrust comes from AI not really knowing the answer to my questions because it makes wrong assumptions about which version of the program I'm having a problem with (in spite of being told EXACTLY which version I'm using). Great article!
ReplyDeleteThank you
Delete