SCIENCE28 - Intelligent Alien Life in the Universe?
I’ve always been interested in
human evolution and have studied and written about the subject. I’ve also been fascinated about the prospect
of intelligent alien life in the universe.
I’ve followed closely over the last few decades as we have built
elaborate earth-bound antenna farms to “listen” for alien communications, and
launched increasingly powerful telescopes to try to find “markers” or signs of
advanced alien civilizations. I’ve also
noted, and sometimes been amused by, the imaginative fictional depictions of
alien life forms in books and films.
While ruminating on all this one
day recently, I wondered what “science” says today about the possibility of
intelligent alien life existing somewhere in the universe, and if it does,
would alien life forms have evolved to look and act anything like humans
(humanoids). I realize that there are no
answers to these questions yet, but I thought it would be useful and fun to
explore these questions and summarize arguments for and against.
So, in this blog, after reviewing
the key steps in human evolution for reference, I’ll discuss arguments for and
against the existence of intelligent alien life, and arguments for and against
any intelligent alien life being similar to us.
I warn the reader up front that
my format to address these issues will be subheading-dominated so that I can
most efficiently organize the data and my thoughts.
As usual, I will list my sources
at the end.
Key Steps
in Human Evolution
I thought
it would be useful to review the key steps in human evolution on Earth as a
basis for evaluating the possibility of similar evolution of intelligent aliens
on other worlds.
Life
began on Earth 3.5 to 3.8 billion years ago (bya) with single-cell
microorganisms (that evolved from primitive protocells) that lived without
oxygen, were heat-loving, and inhabited geochemically active environments like
hydrothermal vents.
Between 3.5 bya and 700 million years ago (mya), life on
Earth was predominantly microscopic, evolving from single-cell
microorganisms to include bacteria and more complex cells. The major
transition during this period was the evolution of photosynthesis, which began
to release oxygen into the atmosphere, and the eventual appearance of complex,
multicellular life.
The slow pace of evolution between 3.5 bya and 700 mya was
due to limiting environmental conditions and the complexity of developing
multicellular life. Key factors included the
extremely low levels of oxygen in the atmosphere, which were necessary for
complex animal life, and the immense genetic and cellular hurdles that had to
be overcome to evolve beyond simple, single-celled organisms. It took a long period for life to build the
genetic tools and complexity needed to create the first animals.
Around 600
mya to 700 mya, the first sea animals (sea sponges and comb jellies) appeared.
Up until
about 500 mya, all life was sequestered in the sea. Fish were the first vertebrates and
introduced additional organs like stomachs, spleens, and body components like
scales, teeth, blood, and more. Bony
fish arose, and over time their development brought about sophisticated changes
to the skeletal system, eventually producing “proto-limbs” that would enable
organisms to walk on land.
The first
land animals (420 mya) were millipedes or other arthropods (segmented
bodies, jointed appendages, and hard external skeleton). These creatures eventually became tetrapods (“four-footed”), and they had features like
four-legs, a backbone, and lungs which could absorb oxygen from air. All the amphibians, reptiles, birds, and
mammals that followed are descendants of the original tetrapods.
Around
225 mya, the first mammals emerged as small, shrew-like creatures that
lived alongside the dinosaurs. Over
time, mammals evolved hair, specialized teeth, sweat glands to regulate body
temperature, and a more efficient circulatory system. Mammals also brought about features like
nocturnality, mammary glands, external genitalia, and a variety of other
features that distinguished them from other living species at the time, like
birds or reptiles.
The first primates, which had
features like larger brains and forward-facing eyes, appeared around 55-56
mya. Around 7
mya, the first great apes emerged in Africa.
These apes, such as orangutans, gorillas, and chimpanzees, were highly
intelligent and social creatures that lived in complex communities.
About 2.5
mya, one lineage of apes gave rise to the first members of the genus Homo. The main developmental changes
during this time were the full-time bipedalism of apes, increasing brain size,
and advanced bone development that enabled dexterity for tool construction and
hunting. Inventions like fire
and clothing arose early in the Homo genus, and
eventually complex language, hair loss, and dramatic facial changes would
evolve.
Our human
species, homo sapiens emerged about 300,000 years ago, with advanced
cognitive abilities, complex language, art, and eventually, agriculture, and
civilization.
![]() |
| Key evolutionary stages for evolution of humans on Earth. |
Human evolution occurred through the process of natural
selection, where organisms with heritable traits better suited to their
environment are more likely to survive and reproduce.
Over many generations, the advantageous, heritable
traits become more frequent in the population, causing the population as a
whole to become better adapted to its environment. While the genetic
mutations that cause variation are random, the selection process itself is not.
Traits that benefit survival and
reproduction become more common, while those that don't are less likely to be
passed on. This mechanism drives evolution,
leading to the diversification of species as populations adapt to their
environments.
Evolution of life on Earth was interrupted by five mass
extinction events between 444 mya and 65 mya, caused by severe changes in
climate and ocean chemistry, volcanic activity, and an asteroid impact. These events killed up to 96% of life
existing at the time, resulting in opportunities for new species to
replace the ones that had died off and, in some cases, accelerating the
evolution of certain species, including humans.
See my blog on the subject at: https://bobringreflections.blogspot.com/2025/06/science22-mass-extinctions-accelerated.html.
Arguments
for the Existence of Intelligent Alien Life
The
statistical likelihood of intelligent alien life is considered to be high by
many scientists. This is based on the
vast number of stars and potentially habitable planets in the universe.
Vastness
of the Universe: The
observable universe is estimated to contain 200 billion trillion stars. Our Milky Way galaxy alone has hundreds of
billions of stars and could have billions of Earth-like planets. Even if the odds of intelligent life emerging
on any single habitable planet are small, the sheer number of planets makes it
seem highly probable that intelligent life has arisen elsewhere.
In 1961, astronomer Frank Drake created the Drake equation, a
formula to estimate the number of active, communicative extraterrestrial
civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy. It's a probabilistic argument that
multiplies seven factors, including the rate of star formation and the fraction
of stars with planets, to estimate the number of civilizations that could be
detectable. While it's a valuable framework for organizing research, many
of the variables are still unknown, making it impossible to get a precise
answer. However, for over 60 years, the
equation has produced a lot of discussion and spurred the search for
intelligent alien life.
![]() |
| Astronomer Frank Drake’s equation has spurred the search for intelligent alien life. |
Early Life
on Earth: Evidence suggests that life on
Earth began relatively soon after the planet formed and became habitable. Some scientists argue that if life began so
quickly here, it may be common throughout the cosmos, provided the right
conditions exist.
Panspermia: This theory suggests that microscopic life forms,
such as bacteria, can travel through space via comets or meteoroids, seeding
life on other planets. The discovery on Earth of microorganisms that are
adapted to thrive in environments with
conditions typically lethal to other life forms, such as
extremes of temperature, pressure, radiation, salinity, or pH (measure of acidic or alkaline), and the presence of organic molecules on meteorites and
in space, lend some support to the possibility of life surviving interplanetary
travel.
Arguments
against the Existence of Intelligent Alien Life.
The Fermi
Paradox, first articulated by physicist Enrico Fermi in 1950, highlights the
contradiction between a high probability of alien life and the complete lack of
evidence for it.
![]() |
| The Fermi Paradox leads to the central question: "Where is everybody?". |
Here are
two potential explanations for this cosmic silence:
The Great
Filter: This theory posits that at some
point between the initial spark of life and the development of a civilization
capable of interstellar space travel, there is a barrier that is incredibly
difficult for life to overcome. This could be the origin of life itself, the
rise of complex cells, or, more ominously, a propensity for technological
civilizations to destroy themselves.
Intelligent
Life is Rare: It's possible that the specific
conditions that allowed for intelligent life to develop on Earth are
exceptionally rare, making intelligent life here a statistical fluke. This Rare Earth hypothesis suggests that the
evolution of complex, multicellular life to intelligent life requires a perfect
and highly improbable combination of circumstances.
Arguments
for Humanoid Intelligent Aliens
For an
alien species to become technologically advanced, it is likely to inhabit a
moderate-gravity, land-based environment with access to a rich energy source,
like a star. These conditions could
favor the evolution of a body plan that is generally similar to ours.
An
optimistic view that intelligent alien life might be humanoid is supported by
the concept of convergent evolution and a recent study that alien life might be
more likely to be humanoid that previously thought.
Convergent
Evolution. This theory suggests that similar
environmental and physical challenges can lead to independently evolved species
developing comparable features and body plans, even on different planets.
The principle of convergent evolution has been studied for centuries,
with early ideas stemming from anatomical comparisons that revealed similar
structures despite distant ancestry. Naturalist Richard Owen, in the 19th
century, laid the groundwork for understanding convergent evolution. The
concept gained further scientific momentum as evolutionary theory developed and
was later confirmed through genetics, which demonstrated how unrelated species
independently evolved similar traits in response to similar environmental
pressures
On Earth,
the phenomenon of convergent evolution has produced similar features in
unrelated species. For example, both
dolphins (mammals) and ichthyosaurs (reptiles) evolved streamlined bodies and
fins for efficient movement in water.
And both birds (reptiles) and bats (mammals) evolved wings for flight.
An
optimistic view applies this phenomenon to planets outside our solar
system. This means that if another world shared certain environmental
characteristics with Earth, intelligent life there could develop some
"humanoid” features, including traits such as:
Bilateral
Symmetry: A body plan with two mirrored halves offers
superior maneuverability and is a common evolutionary strategy on Earth.
Energy
Efficiency: Standing upright offers
long-distance visibility with a relatively low body mass. An upright posture also conserves energy
during movement, allowing a species to cover more ground with less effort.
Tool
Manipulation: A
bipedal posture frees the upper limbs to become highly dexterous for creating
and using complex tools. Opposable
thumbs, a key feature of the humanoid form, allow for fine manipulation, which
is critical for developing advanced technology.
Sensory
Arrangement: A head
with bilateral sensory organs like eyes, ears, and nostrils provides
stereoscopic vision and hearing, which is advantageous for perceiving and
navigating a three-dimensional world.
This arrangement is also an efficient way to house the primary command
center, or brain, of a complex organism.
Adaptability: A
versatile, generalized body plan allows a species to thrive in multiple
environments, rather than being limited to a specialized niche. This
adaptability could be crucial for a species hoping to spread beyond its home
planet.
This interpretation imagines the
humanoid form as a practical, and therefore common, solution to the challenges
of developing advanced intelligence.
Alternatively, this perspective does not suggest that
aliens would look exactly like humans, but rather that a broadly humanoid body
plan is a plausible outcome of evolution.
Intelligent alien life would likely be defined by the unique
environmental conditions of its home planet. This view allows for a
diverse array of variations, including different skin textures, extra eyes, or
unique appendages.
![]() |
| Humanoid alien concept. |
Recent
Study. In a 2017 study, scientists at the University of Oxford
concluded that aliens could be shaped by the same evolutionary processes as
humans, making them potentially similar to us. The research suggests that the theory of
evolution, and the principle of natural selection, are universal and would
apply to life anywhere in the cosmos. Key points from the 2017 study:
Universal
Laws of Evolution: The
Oxford study argues against the idea that extraterrestrial life would be
monstrously different due to the randomness of evolution. It posits that because natural selection is a
universal mechanism, aliens would be shaped by similar forces to adapt and
survive in their unique environment.
Predictable
Traits from Convergent Evolution: The
study builds on the concept of convergent evolution, which demonstrates that
similar environmental pressures on Earth often lead to analogous physical
features in unrelated species. Applied
on a universal scale, this could mean that alien life may develop familiar
traits, such as:
Bilateral
Symmetry: Having two sides that are mirror
images of each other.
Limbs: Appendages for movement.
Heads
with Sensory Organs: A
concentrated area for sensory perception, like eyes and ears.
Digestive
Systems: Internal structures for processing
nutrients.
The
researchers argue that this predictable, "universal" form of
evolution challenges the view that intelligence is a complete fluke of chance
and is far-fetched on any planet. While
this does not guarantee human-like aliens, it increases the odds that
intelligent extraterrestrial life might follow a recognizable path to
complexity.
The idea of humanoid aliens is deeply
rooted in our culture for understandable reasons. The humanoid form is
familiar, and makes characters more relatable for human audiences. For decades, science fiction has presented us
with countless examples of humanoid aliens. By portraying extraterrestrials as humanoid,
writers make them more relatable, allowing for exploration of human themes like
morality, ethics, and social dynamics.
This convention can be interpreted as an optimistic projection, assuming
that alien intelligence would lead to a body plan capable of communication and
interaction in a way that feels familiar and not overwhelmingly foreign.
The humanoid form is a
testament to the efficient combination of various features that have allowed
humans to thrive and develop technology.
The optimistic view suggests that these same advantageous traits might
logically evolve elsewhere under the right conditions. The humanoid form,
while not guaranteed, presents a highly effective and versatile design for an
intelligent, tool-using species.
Arguments against Humanoid Intelligent
Aliens
While some human traits may appear,
the odds of a truly humanoid alien are astronomically small, largely due to the
sheer variety of evolutionary paths and environmental factors.
Variety of Evolutionary Paths. The
evolution of the human body plan was not a foregone conclusion, but rather the
result of a specific, lengthy, and somewhat unpredictable sequence of events. Reasons intelligent aliens would likely
not be humanoid include:
Evolution is Not a Predetermined Path: Evolution
works by adapting existing forms to changing conditions, not by striving toward
an ideal form. If life on another planet
began with a different basic body plan-for instance, one more like an arthropod,
its path to intelligence would be completely different. Earth's
own octopuses and squids offer a compelling alternative. They possess high intelligence, excellent
problem-solving skills, and a flexible, boneless body with multiple
manipulating tentacles. On another
world, a similar lineage could develop greater manual dexterity or tool-making
capabilities.
![]() |
Concept of nonhumanoid intelligent alien life form
resembling an octopus. |
Another possible type of
intelligent life form could evolve as a stationary organism, perhaps similar to
a plant, that uses mobile, bio-engineered tools or symbiotes (an
organism that lives in a state of symbiosis with another organism) to manipulate its environment.
Alternatives to Bipedalism: Walking
upright was one of the most important factors in human evolution, freeing the
hands for tool use and allowing for greater endurance running. While bipedalism offers benefits, such as
thermoregulation and efficient low-speed movement, it is not the only viable
mode of locomotion for an intelligent species.
Other options could include:
·
Tripedalism or hexapedalism for increased stability.
·
Aquatic species that use fins or tentacles.
·
Arboreal creatures that retain tree-dwelling
adaptations.
Alternative Paths to Tool Use /
Opposable Thumbs: Our fine motor skills are a product of our
arboreal ancestry and a complex set of evolutionary changes. Other species on
Earth have developed dexterity in different ways. The giant panda, for example, evolved a
thumb-like structure from a wrist bone, completely different from human
anatomy. A non-humanoid species might
develop manipulating appendages for tool use in a different way or in a
different location on its body. An
octopus, for example, has highly dexterous tentacles and is quite intelligent,
demonstrating an alternative evolutionary path.
Different Forms of Intelligence: Intelligence
itself may not be the same. An alien
civilization could be a hive-mind, a distributed network where individual
organisms possess limited intelligence but function as a collective
superorganism with complex capabilities. Or an alien species could evolve that doesn't
rely on technology in a way humans would recognize.
Alternative Biochemistry: Several forms of biochemistry are agreed to be scientifically viable, but are not proven to exist currently. Life on Earth uses carbon compounds for basic structural and metabolic functions, water as a solvent, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or ribonucleic acid (RNA) to define and control their form. If life exists on other planet, it is possible that there are organisms with quite different chemistries - for instance, involving other classes of carbon compounds, compounds of another element, and/or another solvent in place of water.
Planet Identical to Earth. Even
on a planet nearly identical to Earth, intelligent life would almost
certainly not be humanoid. The specific
combination of evolutionary pressures that led to the human form is an
intricate and improbable set of circumstances that would likely play out
differently on another world, even under the same conditions. The principle of convergent evolution
suggests that similar environments can lead to similar physical traits, but it
does not mean life will converge on the human form. For example, the streamlined bodies of sharks
(fish) and dolphins (mammals) are a result of convergent evolution for swimming
efficiency, but they have distinct anatomical differences.
Contingency Events: Evolution
is a process full of chance and historical contingency. The particular genetic mutations, selective
pressures, and mass extinction events that led to our intelligence are highly
specific to Earth's history.
Environmental Factors. A
wide variety of environmental factors could lead to the evolution of
non-humanoid intelligent life. Any
factor that profoundly alters the selective pressures on a developing species could
push evolution down a completely different path from the one that led to
humans.
Gravity. The
gravitational pull of a planet would have a massive effect on the size, shape,
and mobility of any complex life.
High-Gravity Planets: Life
would likely be short, stocky, and dense to withstand the crushing force. A multi-limbed, quadrupedal, or even
multi-legged body plan would be more stable and likely than a bipedal one. Flight would be highly improbable, requiring
either extremely dense air or a different method of locomotion entirely.
Low-Gravity Planets: With
less gravity to fight, life could grow taller and slenderer. Flying creatures
could be common, with larger wing spans and less muscle power required to get
airborne. A civilization could
potentially develop and thrive among the clouds, giving them a completely
different perspective and material culture.
Atmosphere. The
composition and density of a planet's atmosphere are critical to evolution,
especially regarding respiration and the potential for flight.
Dense Atmospheres: A
thick atmosphere would make flight easier, potentially leading to airborne or
buoyant intelligent species that never touch the ground. This could lead to a less tool-oriented or
physically manipulative society.
Different Atmospheric Gases: If
a planet's atmosphere is not oxygen-based, life would need a completely
different biology. For instance, life on
a planet with a hydrogen sulfide atmosphere would likely have a completely
different metabolism and could evolve forms entirely alien to us.

An alien planet’s environment would determine alien life forms.
Resource Distribution. The
way resources are distributed across a planet affects where and how life,
particularly intelligent life, develops.
Subsurface Oceans: If
life and resources are sequestered in a subsurface ocean beneath a frozen
crust, intelligent life would likely be aquatic. An octopus-like species that develops
dexterous manipulator appendages and learns to use bioluminescence to
communicate could emerge. Their
civilization might never use fire or develop terrestrial technologies.
Scarcity and Abundance: If
key elements or minerals are only available in specific, dangerous
locations-like deep-sea hydrothermal vents or volcanic regions-it could drive
the evolution of a species to endure extreme conditions to harvest them. Alternatively, if resources are very
abundant, an organism might not develop the aggressive resourcefulness needed
for tool use and technology.
Type of Star. The
type of star a planet orbits influences everything from the available light to
the planet's overall climate.
Dim or Red Stars: A
planet orbiting a dim red dwarf star might lead to species with much larger
eyes to gather as much light as possible.
This would influence the sensory organs and the species' perception of
its world.
Unstable Stars: An
unstable star, prone to frequent, powerful flares, might favor life that is
hardy and capable of surviving underground or underwater to escape surges of
radiation.
Planetary Geology: A
planet's geological activity, or lack thereof, could shape the evolution of its
intelligent life.
High Volcanism: A
planet with very high volcanic activity might favor species that are resistant
to heat and toxic gases. Their
technological development would be shaped by the readily available geothermal
power.
Tidal Forces: A
moon-bound species that experiences extreme tidal forces could evolve to adapt
to a highly dynamic environment. This
could lead to amphibious life that can survive both under intense pressure and
in harsh surface conditions.
While the factors that drove human evolution might favor traits like
dexterity and problem-solving, the specific combination that produced the
humanoid form is highly improbable to be replicated. The evolutionary path to intelligence is not
a single, predetermined road, but a vast network of possibilities influenced by
countless chance events.
Concluding Observations
I found the arguments for and
against the existence of intelligent alien life and the arguments for and
against that such life, if found would be similar to us, reasonable, but far
from conclusive. Pretty complex
questions with so many unknowns!
However, I believe that even if there’s a high statistical likelihood of
intelligent life-forms having evolved elsewhere in the universe, and even if we
find evidence of intelligent alien life out there someday, there is a very low
probability that we’ll be able to communicate or interact with them. The reasons are the vast distances, and
travel or signal transmission times involved - based on our current
understanding of the universe and its physical laws. Therefore, I believe that we have not been
contacted by aliens in the past, and that Fermi’s Paradox does not apply. These important questions remain open in my
mind.
What
do you think?
“In the deepest sense, the search for
extraterrestrial intelligence is a search for ourselves.” - Carl Sagan, American Astronomer
Sources
My principal
sources include: “Humanoid,” “Fermi Paradox,” and “List of humanoid aliens,”
Wikipedia.com; “Aliens may be more like us than we think,”
ox.ac.uk/news/2017-10-31-aliens-may-be-more-us-we-think; plus, numerous other
online sources, including answers to many queries using Google in AI Mode.






Comments
Post a Comment