SCIENCE8 - The History of Human Evolution
I’ve been on a science bent lately, talking about the Moon, the Sun, and the possibility of finding intelligent extraterrestrial life. Continuing with scientific subjects, this blog is the first of a two-part article about human evolution. Part 1 will cover what we know about the history of human evolution to the present. Part 2, in a separate blog, will discuss how humans might evolve in the future.
My principal sources for this blog include “Human Evolution,” Britannica.com; “Human evolution,” Wikipedia; “Primate Classification and Evolution,” ck12.org; “How Humans Evolved from our Hominid Predecessors,” humanjourney.as; “Recent Human Evolution, Wikipedia; “Six Changes That Prove Humans Are Still Evolving, With Natural Tweaks to Body,” indiatimes.com; and numerous other online sources.
Introduction
Human
evolution is the process by which human beings developed on Earth from
now-extinct primates. This process
involved the gradual change to the DNA of primate species over many
generations, and development of traits such as erect
posture, bipedal locomotion (walking on two feet), larger brains, behavioral
characteristics such as specialized tool use, and, communication through
language.
The basic mechanism of
human evolution is (Charles Darwin’s) natural selection, where genetic mutations that are beneficial to an individual's
survival are passed on through reproduction.
This results in a new generation of individuals that are more likely to
survive to reproduce. Gradually, these mutations and their associated traits become
more common among the whole group. Natural selection can also
give rise to a new and distinctly different species.
Charles Darwin was an English
naturalist, geologist and biologist, best known for his contributions to
evolutionary biology. Darwin published
his theory of evolution with compelling evidence in his 1859 book On the Origin
of Species. Today, natural selection is
accepted as the basic mechanism of evolution.
Charles Darwin (1809-1882), with his natural selection theory of evolution, was one of the most influential persons in human history. |
The main source of knowledge about the human evolutionary
process has traditionally been the fossil record, but since the development of
genetics beginning in the 1970s, DNA analysis has come to occupy a place of
comparable importance.
Based on accumulated
knowledge to date, humans very likely first evolved in Africa about 315,000
years ago.
I’ll continue with a discussion
of the early evolution of primates - through the development of the first
humans, followed by the evolution of early humans to today’s modern human. Then, I’ll step back and review the
anatomical changes that occurred in humans along the evolutionary path. I’ll finished with a snapshot of recent and
ongoing human evolution.
Early Evolution of Primates
Genetic
studies show that primates evolved about 85 million years ago from small mammalian
ancestors that lived in the trees of tropical forests. Many primate characteristics represent
adaptations to life in this challenging, three-dimensional tree-living
environment.
Primates have a skeletal structure that
allows a wide range of motion of the limbs.
This is reflected in the diversity of ways that they move around. They may leap, climb, swing from branch to
branch, walk on all four legs, or walk on two legs. Their relatively unspecialized extremities,
with long digits and nails (instead of claws), are capable of many different
functions - unlike, for example, the more specialized clawed feet of cats or
dogs.
Primates have traditionally been divided into
two major groups, called prosimians and anthropoids. Prosimians include lemurs,
lorises, pottos, and tarsiers.
Anthropoids include monkeys, gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees,
and humans. Prosimians are generally
small in size and have characteristics similar to the earliest primates,
whereas anthropoids tend to be larger and less similar to early primates.
Primates can be classified on the basis of
their evolutionary history. The chart below shows the common ancestors of
primates. For comparison, the
traditional classification of primates into prosimians and anthropoids is
included at the top of the evolutionary tree.
Common ancestor evolutionary tree for primates. |
If you look at the left side of the tree
above, you can see approximately how long ago the different groups of primates
diverged from their common ancestors.
An ancestral primate relative left abundant
fossil remains in North America and Europe that date to 55-58 million years
ago, but probably originated earlier. This
primate relative was a small, at least partly tree-living mammal, that may have
eaten fruits and leaves. This
now-extinct relative had a small brain and claws instead of nails. Its eyes were located
on the sides of the head, which meant it lacked three dimensional vision. With these traits, this relative itself was
not a primate, but it was a likely ancestor of primates.
Once the first primates emerged, they
continued to evolve until the present.
During that long time span, primates underwent a series of evolutionary
divergences, in which the major groups of primates branched off and new common
ancestors emerged.
The first major divergence probably occurred
close to 60 million years ago, when the lineage that would evolve into modern
lemurs, lorises, and pottos branched off from other early primates.
1. The divergence that led to the tarsiers probably dates to
about 55 million years ago. The earliest tarsier-like fossils date to that
time in East Asia.
2.
The emergence of the common ancestor of all anthropoid
primates (monkeys, gibbons, gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans) is thought to
have occurred around 45 million years ago.
3.
The group of anthropoids that would evolve into modern
New World monkeys probably split from their African ancestors at about the same
time. They traveled from Africa to South
America across the Atlantic Ocean, which, due to continental drift, was much
narrower then. Most likely, a few
primates were carried out to sea on a natural raft of vegetation, and were then
carried to the New World by currents.
4.
A possible common ancestor of Old World monkeys, gibbons,
gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans lived around 35-33 million years ago. It was about 22 to 36 inches in length and
weighed about 17.7 pounds, and lived in subtropical forests, where it was most
likely a tree-living quadruped that fed on fruit.
5.
A possible common ancestor of gibbons, gorillas,
chimpanzees, and humans lived about 23-14 million years ago; probably it walked
on four limbs and fed mainly on fruit, and had a brain larger than a modern
monkey.
6.
Ancestors of gorillas diverged in Africa about 8 million
years ago. Approximately 7-6 million
years ago in Africa, the chimpanzee and human lineages finally diverged. Our first true human ancestors began to
evolve then.
Based on the common-ancestor tree, humans
share the most recent common ancestor with chimpanzees.
The main evolutionary trend of primates has
been the elaboration of the brain. Comparative studies show a continual trend
toward higher intelligence going from prosimians to New World monkeys, to Old
World monkeys, and finally to humans.
The part of the brain that has increased the most is involved with
sensory perception, generation of motor commands, spatial reasoning, and
conscious thought. While other mammals
rely heavily on their sense of smell, the tree-living life of primates has led
to a tactile (touch) and visually-dominant sensory system. At the same time, there has been a reduction
in the olfactory (smell-related) parts of the brain.
With their large brains, primates have
advanced cognitive abilities. One
indication of this is their tool use.
Besides humans, many other species of primates, especially anthropoids,
have been observed using items in their environment as tools. Gorillas have been observed using a stick to
test the depth of water as they wade
through it. Monkeys have been documented
cracking nuts by placing them on an "anvil" stone and hitting them
with another large stone. Monkeys also
use stones to crack open crabs and other shellfish. Some primates make tools, as
well. Chimpanzees, for example, strip
leaves from twigs and insert the twigs into termite mounds to "fish"
for edible insects. They also sharpen sticks to use as spears for
hunting small mammals.
Another trend in primate evolution has been
an increasing dependence on complex social behavior. Primates
are among the most social of animals. They live in mated pairs, small family
groups, or groups of up to dozens of individuals. Cooperation within the group helps to ensure
that all group members survive.
Cooperative social behaviors include grooming, food sharing, and
collective defense against predators or of territory.
Evolution of Humans
We
humans are members of a primate species called Homo sapiens (“wise man” in Latin) that very likely first evolved in Africa about 315,000 years ago. We are now the only living members of what
many zoologists refer to as the human family, but there is abundant fossil
evidence to indicate that we were preceded for millions of years by other
primates in the human family (called hominins).
The
evolution chart below shows the divergence of gorillas from hominins,
chimpanzees, and bonobos; the divergence of hominins from chimpanzees and
bonobos; and a representative evolution of hominins to Homo sapiens
(modern humans).
Bonobos,
once known as pygmy chimpanzees, and thought to be a subspecies of chimpanzees,
have been recognized as a distinct species.
The divergence and evolution of humans from common ancestors. |
The
earliest hominins arose some 6 to 7 million years ago. (At least seven primate species have been advocated as
possible direct ancestors to the early hominins, though there is no consensus
among experts.)
Referring
to the above evolution diagram, eight primate species are shown - each
eventually going extinct - along the evolution path to Homo sapiens. (Other primate species certainly existed; the
hominin species shown have consensus agreement among experts.)
The
first hominin fossils found, remains of Homo neanderthalensis, were
found in Germany in 1856, three years before the publication of Charles
Darwin’s, On the Origin of the Species.
Despite the 1891 discovery of Homo erectus fossils at Trinil,
Java, it was only in the 1920s when such fossils were discovered in Africa,
that fossils of hominin species began to accumulate. During
the 1960s and 1970s, hundreds of fossils were found in East Africa by the
Leakey family in the regions of the Olduvai Gorge and Lake Turkana. These finds cemented Africa as the “cradle of
humankind.” In the late 1970s and the
1980s, Ethiopia emerged as the new hot spot of paleoanthropology. Meanwhile, discoveries of additional hominin
fossils, from several different species, were accumulating around the world,
including northwestern Africa, south Africa, Europe, southern Asia, Indonesia,
and Australia.
Sites of important hominin excavations.
The trove of fossils from Africa and Eurasia indicates that, unlike today, more than one species of the human family lived at the same time for most of human history.
Prime
examples are Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis - both
arising in Eurasia. Homo erectus
(upright man) first emerged about 2 million years ago, died out about 100,000
years ago, and was the first human ancestor to spread to northern Africa and
southern Asia. Homo erectus was the
first human species to exhibit a flat face, prominent nose, and possibly sparse
body hair coverage. Homo erectus
developed predatory behavior and coordinated hunting. Homo erectus is also postulated to have
been the earliest human ancestor capable of using fire, hunting and gathering
in coordinated groups, caring for injured or sick group members, and possibly
seafaring.
Homo
neanderthalensis (named after the
German valley where the first fossils were found) emerged at least 200,000
years ago and died out perhaps between 35,000 and 24,000 years ago, living in
Europe and western Asia. They
manufactured and used tools (including blades, awls, and sharpening
instruments), developed a spoken language, and developed a rich culture that
involved hearth construction, traditional medicine, and the burial of their
dead. Neanderthals also created art;
evidence shows that some painted with naturally occurring pigments. Neanderthals were replaced by modern humans (Homo
sapiens).
The linear view of human evolution (represented by a branching
tree) began to be abandoned in the 1970s as different species of humans were
discovered that made the linear concept increasingly unlikely. In 2010, evidence based on molecular biology
was published, revealing unambiguous examples of interbreeding between archaic
and modern humans. These discoveries
show that human evolution should not be seen as a simple linear or branched direct
progression, but a mix of related species.
In fact, genomic research has shown that interbreeding between
substantially diverged lineages is the rule, not the exception, in human
evolution. Furthermore, it is argued that interbreeding
was an essential creative force in the emergence of modern humans.
Homo
sapiens are
distinguished by a more highly developed brain that allows for articulate speech and abstract reasoning. Humans display a marked erectness of body
carriage that frees the hands for use as manipulative members. The oldest known remains of Homo sapiens
- a collection of skull fragments, a complete jawbone, and stone tools - date
to about 315,000 years ago.
In
2017, the announcement of this discovery in Jebel Irhoud, Morocco rocked the
human evolution world. Until then, the firmest finds of early Homo sapiens were
from two sites in Ethiopia, dating to around 200,000 years old. Those fossils put the spotlight on eastern
sub-Saharan Africa for the origin of our species. But the new discovery in northwestern Africa,
more than 3,000 miles away, set the origin back over 100,000 years and widened
the “cradle of mankind” to encompass all of Africa!
Evolution of the human family.
Modern humans started burying their
dead, using animal hides to make clothing, hunting with more sophisticated
techniques (such as using trapping pits or driving animals off cliffs), and
engaging in cave painting. Artifacts
such as fish hooks, buttons, and bone needles show signs of variation among
different populations of humans, something that had not been seen in human
cultures prior to 50,000 years ago.
Among concrete examples of modern
human behavior, anthropologists include specialization of tools, use of jewelry
and images (such as cave drawings), organization of living space, rituals (for
example, burials with grave gifts), specialized hunting techniques, exploration
of less hospitable geographical areas, and barter trade networks.
Homo sapiens dispersed from Africa in several waves, from possibly as
early as 200,000 years ago, and certainly by 150,000 years ago. leading to the
lasting colonization of Eurasia by
45,000 years ago and Oceania by 50,000 years ago. Dispersal continued into northern Asia about
20,000 years ago, and into North America about 15,000 years ago.
Modern human (Homo sapiens) migration populated the world. (Numbers in the chart are “years ago” dispersals.)
Anthropologists and biologists everywhere agree that we and the other hominids, both living and extinct, are somehow related. Yet the exact nature of our evolutionary relationships is still the subject of debate and investigation.
Anatomical Changes
Human
evolution, from its first separation from the last common ancestor of humans, chimpanzees,
and bonobos, is characterized by a number of changes. The most significant of these adaptations are
bipedalism, increased brain size, sexual differences, and thumb-pinky
opposition. The relationship between
these changes is the subject of ongoing debate.
Bipedalism. Bipedalism
is the basic adaptation of gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, and humans (hominid
family). It is possible that
bipedalism was favored because it freed the hands for reaching and carrying
food, saved energy during locomotion, enabled long-distance running and
hunting, provided an enhanced field of vision, and helped avoid hyperthermia by
reducing the surface area exposed to direct sun.
Anatomically,
the evolution of bipedalism has been accompanied by a large number of skeletal
changes, not just to the legs and pelvis, but also to the vertebral column,
feet, and ankles. The femur evolved into a slightly more angular position
to move the body’s center of gravity toward the geometric center. The knee and ankle joints became increasingly
robust to better support increased weight.
To support more weight on each vertebra in the upright position, the
human vertebral column became S-shaped and the lumbar vertebrae became shorter
and wider. The big toe moved into
alignment with the other toes to help in forward locomotion. The arms and forearms shortened relative to
the legs, making it easier to run.
The
most significant changes occurred in the pelvic region, where the long downward
facing iliac blade was shortened and widened as a requirement for keeping the
center of gravity stable while walking.
Bipedal hominids have a shorter, but broader, bowl-like pelvis due to
this. A drawback is that the birth canal
of bipedal hominids is smaller than in knuckle-walking hominids.
The
shortening of the pelvis and smaller birth canal had significant effects on the
process of human birth, which is much more difficult in modern humans than in
other primates. During human birth,
because of the variation in size of the pelvic region, the fetal head must be
in a transverse position (compared to the mother) during entry into the birth
canal, and rotate about 90 degrees upon exit.
The smaller birth canal became a limiting factor to brain size increases
in early humans and prompted a shorter gestation period, leading to the
relative immaturity of human offspring, who are unable to walk much before 12
months, and have slower development, compared to other primates, who are mobile
at a much earlier age.
The
increased brain growth after birth, and the increased dependency of children on
mothers, had a major effect upon the female reproductive cycle, and the more
frequent appearance of non-descendent parenting in humans when compared with
other hominids. Delayed human sexual maturity also led to the
evolution of menopause, with one explanation being that elderly women could
better pass on their genes by taking care of their daughter's offspring, as
compared to having more children of their own.
Increase
in Brain Size. The human species eventually developed a much
larger brain than that of other primates - in modern humans, nearly three times
the size of a chimpanzee or gorilla brain. This brain increase, manifested during
postnatal brain growth, allowed for extended periods of social learning and language
acquisition in juvenile humans.
Sexual
Differences. Reduced differences in size or appearance
between the sexes is visible primarily
in the reduction of the male canine tooth relative to other hominids (except
gibbons), and reduced brow ridges and general robustness of males.
Another
important physiological change related to sexuality in humans was the evolution
to continuous female sexual receptivity.
Humans are the only hominids in which the female is fertile year-round,
and in which no special signals of fertility are produced by the body, such as
genital swelling or biology-caused seeking of the male’s attention by females.
Nonetheless,
humans retain a degree of sexual differences in the distribution of body hair and
subcutaneous fat, and in overall size, males being around 15% larger than
females.
Thumb-Pinky
Opposition. The contact between the thumb and the tip of
the little finger of the same hand - is unique to the Homo family. In other primates, the thumb is short and
unable to touch the little finger. This ulnar opposition facilitates the
precision grip and power grip of the human hand, underlying all the skilled
manipulations.
Other
Changes. A number of other changes have also
characterized the evolution of humans, among them an increased importance on
vision, rather than smell; a smaller gut; faster basal metabolism (the
rate at which the body uses energy while at rest to maintain vital functions
such as breathing and keeping warm); loss of body
hair; evolution of sweat glands; development of a chin (found in Homo
sapiens alone); development of the styloid process (a slender pointed piece of bone just
below the ear, projecting down and forward from the skull to serve as an anchor
point for several muscles associated with the tongue and larynx); and the development of a descended larynx (housed in
the thyroid cartilage for protection of the trachea and sound production).
In summary, humans share a common ancestor with gorillas,
chimpanzees, and bonobos that lived about 10 million years ago, when gorillas
diverged into a separate line. About 7
million years ago, the human line diverged from chimpanzees and bonobos, who
are our closest relatives.
Anatomical differences between humans and chimpanzees, our closet relative.
Recent and Ongoing Evolution
Genetic studies have demonstrated that modern humans are still undergoing natural
selection for several traits. Some of
these are due to specific environmental pressures, while others are related to
lifestyle changes since the development of agriculture (10,000 years ago),
urbanization (5,000 years ago), and industrialization (250 years ago). It has been argued that human evolution has
even accelerated since these developments.
Here are a few examples.
Survivors
of infectious disease outbreaks drive natural selection by giving their
genetic resistance to offspring. Our DNA
shows evidence for recent selection for resistance of killer diseases like
Lassa fever and malaria. Selection in
response to malaria is still ongoing in regions where the disease remains
common.
Mutations
allowing humans to live at high altitudes have become more common in
populations in Tibet, Ethiopia, and the Andes.
The spread of genetic mutations in Tibet is possibly the fastest
evolutionary change in humans, occurring over the last 3,000 years. This rapid surge in frequency of a mutated
gene that increases blood oxygen content gives locals a survival advantage in
higher altitudes, resulting in more surviving children.
Diet is another source for adaptations. DNA evidence shows a recent adaptation that
allows Eskimos to thrive on their fat-rich diet of Arctic mammals. Studies also show that natural selection
favoring a mutation allowing adults to produce lactase - the enzyme that breaks
down milk sugars - is why some groups of people can digest milk after
weaning. In 2016, scientists discovered
a mutation in the gene among vegetarians in India which allowed them to produce
from vegetarian sources, essential omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, responsible
for healthy brain function.
We
may well be adapting to unhealthy diets too.
One study of family genetic changes in the U.S. during the 20th
century found selection for reduced blood pressure and cholesterol levels, both
of which can be lethally raised by modern diets.
Finally,
our bones are getting lighter.
Our ancestors had denser and heavier bones than us. A study from 2015, undertaken by an
anthropologist Habiba, posited that our skeletons have become more delicate as
food security improved with agriculture - another proof of how we evolve as a
species is dictated by how our societies and humanity's activity levels evolve.
Where
does Human Evolution go from Here?
Nowadays, with the availability of better healthcare, food,
heating and hygiene, the number of “hazards” we experience in our lives has
dramatically reduced. In scientific
terms, these hazards are referred to as selection pressures. They put pressure on us to adapt in order to
survive the environment we are in, and reproduce. It is selection pressure that drives natural
selection (survival of the fittest) and it is how we evolved into the species
we are today.
When
you ask for opinions about what future humans might look like, you typically
get one of two answers. Some people trot
out the old science-fiction vision of a big-brained human with a high forehead
and higher intellect. Others say humans
are no longer evolving physically - that technology has put an end to the
brutal logic of natural selection and that evolution is now purely cultural. These people say, “It’s
not really a biological question anymore, it’s technological.”
In Part 2 of this article, “The
Future of Human Evolution,” I’ll talk about the transition from natural
evolution to technological evolution.
Comments
Post a Comment